Archive for Sterling

Symposium themes and questions

New forms of digital infrastructure allow everyone on the network to communicate in real time. As a byproduct of this, institutional forms are collapsing or fundamentally changing; education has to respond, both to maintain its value as an institution, and also as a basic act of self preservation. In the near future students will finance their educations through micro-economics, and professors will grade work through crowd sourcing. What social and technical metrics will play a role in this? How will education respond with agility? Can it?

Contemporary political philosophers [Toni Negri, Giorgio Agamben, Eugene Thacker] devote substantial thought to the emerging ‘multitude’. And today, crowdsourcing, collective intelligence, microblogging, Twitter, Tumblr, & other totally new and capillary forms of metricizing human data, are all transforming our everyday lives. Is there a relationship between these two movements? What will cities, governments, institutions do to respond to this new political body?

Cities have been formed by social networks for as long as there have been cities. But the speed at which information flows through those networks has, in the past decade, accelerated to a point where what formerly took weeks, months, years can now propagate globally in minutes. How can we build new cities [China..] while rethinking fundamental ideas of information flow, systems behavior, and infrastructure? What would a city look like if designed from the ground up for users who see it entirely through Yelp, Layar, and UrbanSpoon? In what ways can the huge cultural and political gaps that exist between EU, US, Asia, find compromise or conversation spaces as these new technologies spread out into the world faster than we can track?

John Brunner wrote Shockwave Rider, a science fiction novel, in the early 70s. In it he predicted many aspects of early 21st century life, including the internet, the emergence of ‘worms’ on the internet, the idea of an ambient global information system, the evolution of microcultures, the rapid and total emergence of crowdsourcing, and perhaps most importantly, he predicted the appearance of ‘future shock’ in the everyday life of all people as a consequence of their ever expanding connections to a national and global network. As we ourselves participate more and more in a globalizing, modernizing world, what kinds of realworld future shock are we experiencing? Is the much discussed ‘Clash of Civilizations’ [Huntington] a byproduct of this globalization? Or is the counter model, the ‘Clash of Fundamentalisms’ [Tariq Ali] a result? What role does network technology and social networking on a GLOBAL scale play in these kinds of ‘clashes’? How can we measure, predict, and design for the role that technology plays in this accelerated form of globalization?

Bruce Sterling has discussed the concept of the SPIME [‘space time object’] in his book SHAPING THINGS. He argues that in the very near future, all THINGS will be networked through RFID and other technology, and that the ‘network of objects’ will soon be vaster than the network between humans. EVERYTHING will be wirelessly networked. Cars, phones, pocketknives, jackets, sunglasses, computer parts, tires, ribeye steaks, skin creme; all these things, objects, products will be trackable and able to ‘phone home’ in various ways, for many reasons. What kind of new connections will this vast ‘multititude of things’ have to human networks? To political and economic systems?

-Ed Keller